In the dynamic world of live streaming, BIGO Live has long stood as a beacon for interactive and engaging content. However, recent trends have sparked a debate within the community, raising questions about the sustainability and quality of content on the platform. Let’s delve into the core of these issues.
The “Leave a Penny, Take a Penny” Syndrome
BIGO Live’s recent policy shift, opening its doors to virtually anyone with a pulse to become a host, has created a unique situation reminiscent of the “leave a penny, take a penny” dish at convenience stores. The principle is simple: for a community to thrive, there needs to be a balance between giving and receiving. In BIGO’s case, this translates to a balance between hosts and gifters.
The challenge arises when everyone becomes a host. Who then supports these hosts? The platform’s economy is akin to an ecosystem where gifters are just as crucial as hosts. However, with the floodgates open, we’re witnessing a dwindling pool of gifters, creating an environment where the platform’s economy might struggle to sustain itself.
The Bigo Big Boss (BBB) Program: A Misguided Incentive?
BIGO Live introduced the Bigo Big Boss (BBB) Program, ostensibly to encourage participation by offering a 100% rebate or more on gifts received to non-hosts. On paper, this seems like an innovative idea to stimulate engagement. However, in practice, it might be missing the mark.
The fundamental flaw lies in the expectation it sets. Why should non-hosts go live and receive gifts? This approach artificially inflates expectations among gifters, supporters, and other non-hosts, placing undue pressure on genuinely talented and entertaining hosts to reciprocate with gifts. It disrupts the organic nature of gifting and engagement, which should ideally be based on the quality of content and not on incentivized expectations.
The Need for Exclusivity in Content Creation
Live streaming, at its best, is an art form. It should be an exclusive domain for high-level and elite content creators like Alecia G, Fire Princess, Bendy Barbie, or Sleepwalker. These creators consistently deliver top-notch content to their audiences, setting a standard for what live streaming can and should be.
Currently, the platform is inundated with streams that lack engagement and purpose — broadcasters watching TV, playing video games, or paying scant attention to their audience. These types of streams, which contribute little to the community, should be reconsidered for their place in the signed host program.
Conclusion: Striving for Quality over Quantity
As BIGO Live navigates these challenges, the path forward should focus on quality over quantity. By incentivizing high-quality content and maintaining a balance between hosts and gifters, BIGO Live can continue to be a vibrant platform that celebrates creativity and genuine engagement. It’s not just about having a large number of hosts; it’s about nurturing a community where talent, interaction, and quality content are the cornerstones of success.
